For interviews or additional information,
contact Frank Maisano at (202) 828-5864,
(202) 997-5932 (mobile) or frank.maisano@bracewell.com.
Media Center
Video
ERCC Media Statements
August 5, 2015
ERCC's Scott Segal Says Clean Power Plan is "Lots of Pain with Questionable Benefits" in US News and World Report's Debate Club
read
August 3, 2015
ERCC Answers Ten Important Questions You Have About EPA's Final Rule on Carbon Emissions from Power Plants
read
July 8, 2014
ERCC Request for Extended Comment Period for Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources
read
June 24, 2014
ERCC Executive Director Scott Segal Discusses EPA's Authority Over Power Plant Emissions on the Diane Rehm Show
read
June 2, 2014
ERCC executive director Scott Segal statement on EPA rule for existing coal-fired power plants
read
May 31, 2014
ERCC Answers Seven Questions You Should Have About EPA's Proposed Rule on Carbon Emissions from Existing Power Plants
read
September 20, 2013
Electric Reliability Coordinating Council Reacts to the EPA Proposal on Carbon Emissions from New Coal-Fired Power Plants
read
July 20, 2012
ERCC Statement on decision of EPA to grant a petition for reconsideration of part of the Mercury and Air Toxics Rule (MATS), by Scott Segal
read
June 20, 2012
ERCC Statement on the Senate's failure to proceed on the CRA motion, by Scott Segal
readEditorials and Op-eds
February 10, 2016
ERCC's Segal & Holmstead: Why the Supreme Court Put New Climate Rules on Hold
read
July 1, 2013
Point-Counterpoint: Is it Time for a Carbon Tax, by ERCC's Scott Segal, published in Corporate Counsel
read
June 1, 2013
"Coal Still Has Important Role to Play," by ERCC's Scott Segal, published in Enviornmental Forum
read
November 21, 2012
“Carbon Tax Isn’t the Solution,” by ERCC's Scott Segal, Editorial in the Houston Chronicle
read
October 18, 2012
"Regressive levy will cost jobs, hurt climate" by ERCC's Scott Segal, Editorial in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
read
May 17, 2011
“EPA rules threaten coal jobs,” by Cecil E. Roberts, published in the Charleston Gazette
readStatements, Studies and Analysis
February 23, 2016
Eighteen Former State Public Utility Commissioners File Amicus Brief Regarding EPA's Clean Power Plan
read
December 1, 2014
ERCC comments on the proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule to limit carbon emissions from existing power plants, known as the Clean Power Plan.
read
October 19, 2014
ERCC Comments on EPA’s Proposed Rule for Modified & Reconstructed Sources
ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2013-0603
read
June 6, 2014
Members of Congress and Health Care Professionals Letter to EPA on Carbon Regulations
read
May 8, 2014
ERCC Comments on Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units
read
July 18, 2013
Testimony of Bud Weinstein before the House Committee on Small Business Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade on the President's Climate Action Plan
read
June 12, 2013
Testimony of Jeff Holmstead before the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Environment on Achievability of New Ozone Standards
read
April 12, 2013
Testimony of ERCC's Scott Segal before the Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Power on the Energy Consumers Relief Act of 2013
read
June 25, 2012
ERCC Comments Submitted to EPA on the New Source Performance Standards for Power Plant Carbon Emissions
read
May 24, 2012
Highlights from ERCC's Scott Segal’s Oral Statement at the EPA Public Hearing on the Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for Future Power Plants
May 24, 2012
Testimony of ERCC's Scott Segal at the EPA Public Hearing on the Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for Future Power Plants
April 17, 2012
Testimony of Jeff Holmstead before the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee on Mercury Pollution's Impacts to Public Health and the Environment
read
March 27, 2012
ERCC Letter to OMB Administrator Cass Sunstein New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Power Plants
read
March 14, 2012
EPA Power Sector Rule Increases the Cost of Gasoline Production and Decreases the Diversity of US Energy Production – Version 2.0
read